时间:2022-6-12 作者:星沙英语网

In the late 1950s, US relations with Communist China were virtually nonexistent. Trade had been tightly controlled since China’s intervention in North Korea in 1950, and, to deny Beijing any advantage from commercial or financial transactions, the Secretary of the Treasury issued strict regulations prohibiting the import of goods that originated in or had passed through Communist China. There were rarely any exceptions, even for pandas.



In 1958, one frustrated animal importer tried a different tactic. He took his case to the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), Allen Dulles.


Heini Demmer, an Austrian animal dealer, and Frederik Zeehandelaar, a noted animal importer in New Jersey, wanted Dulles’s help in obtaining permission from the Treasury to bring into the US a giant panda.


On January 10, 1958 Dulles received a note with Treasury’s decision: Allowing Chi Chi to enter the US would "constitute a serious departure from the basic policies" laid out in the regulations. Moreover, a giant panda would receive a great deal of publicity and that would lead to a need for Treasury to make a public explanation of the reasons for granting an exception. Unless the DCI had other suggestions, the note stated, the matter was closed.


Treasury’s resistance was not entirely unwarranted. Since the first live panda had been brought to the US in 1936 (registered aboard a ship as a puppy), the giant panda had captured the popular imagination—and become a potent political symbol.


Madame Chiang Kai-shek, wife of the leader of the Republic of China, had dispatched a pair of the bears to the Bronx Zoo in 1941; arriving just after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, they became a symbol of a crucial wartime alliance.


During the decades after the Communist Chinese took control in 1949, as one historian of panda diplomat notes, they would "benefit from the careful deployment of captive pandas for explicitly political purposes


The media manifested little patience with the political symbolism of pandas and seemed to have been unaware of Dulles’s behind-the-scenes representations on Chi Chi’s behalf. They were aware of the rejection, however, and their commentary was harsh.


"The clown of the animal world has been refused entry because it is a resident of Communist China. —–New York Times,May 7,1958


"The state department, despite pleas from leading zoos for clemency, argues that to admit the young panda – darling of animal lovers and toymakers – would violate the law forbidding trade with Communist China."

"尽管美国主要动物园请求宽大处置,但美国国务院依旧觉得假如让熊猫—— 动物喜好者和玩具厂商的最爱——进入美国, 如此做将违反禁止与共产主义中国贸易的法律"。

According to the Washington Post, "The majesty of the United States has been employed to exclude a giant panda from this country…The zoos which have been bidding for him must be content merely to describe to their visitors what a panda is—or to pretend, in the fashion of the State Department attitude toward the Communist government in Peking, that he simply doesn’t exist. Perhaps this sort of panda-ing to rigidity is what is needed to demonstrate the inanity of a policy based on fiction."

据华盛顿邮报报道,"美国的权威机构禁止大熊猫的进入……那些请求进口大熊猫的动物园只能满足于仅仅向来访者描述熊猫是什么样子的,或者像美国国务院对中国政府所实行的态度那样,假装根本就没有所谓的大熊猫。 如此的熊猫政策正好表明了美国对华政策的愚蠢。

"Spurned by Washington, Chi Chi made a triumphal tour of Europe, visiting Frankfurt, Copenhagen, and Berlin before finally winding up at the London Zoo. With the brief exception of a failed conjugal visit to Moscow, she lived there until July 1972.

"虽然遭到华盛顿的忽略,但奇奇在欧洲还算顺利,在访问了法兰克福、 哥本哈根和柏林之后终于落户在伦敦动物园。后来前往莫斯科,她一直住在那里直到1972年7月。

Just a few months before her death, two pandas—Hsing Hsing and Ling Ling—arrived in Washington, a gift from China after President Richard Nixon’s visit to Beijing that year. Ironically, they entered the US through Dulles Airport, named after the same John Foster Dulles whose hatred of "Red China" had helped block Chi Chi’s arrival.

就在她刚刚死的几个月前,两只熊猫 — — 玲玲和兴兴 — — 抵达华盛顿,就在总统理查德 · 尼克松访问北京那一年,这是中国送给美国的礼物。他们在美国杜勒斯机场下飞机,讽刺的是机场名字正是以约翰 · 福斯特 · 杜勒斯命名,就是那个仇恨"红色中国"从而阻止奇奇来美国的人。

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:375750496@qq.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。